I have a few questions about your proposed attacks on Syria. As everyone knows killing children is probably the most evil crime and sin any man can commit, so John Kerry getting upset about the chemical attacks that killed over one thousand people, including hundreds of children in Syria is understandable and I am sure that there are not a lot of people in the world that disagree with Obama when he said the world should not stand for chemical attacks on innocent civilians.
What I would like to know is, how come John Kerry does not get so emotional about murders committed by the American government? Why did you (Barrack Obama) and John Kerry both talk against the war on Iraq but now both support a war on Syria?
Why do you and Kerry believe it is acceptable to murder innocent civilians, destroy lives, cities and towns with drones but not chemical weapons? Should the world stand for drone attacks from the American government, or is it just the chemical attacks that should irritate us? If Assad used drones would you still intervene and why?
Which government has killed more innocent people in the last ten years the American government or the Syrian government? How come the American government never even considered intervening in Egypt when the Egyptian government started killing protesters? How come watching children die from these chemical attacks hurt you so much but watch thousands of children die everyday from poverty related causes does not bother you the same way and does not seem to be a priority to you?
How many corporations, banks and oil companies will profit from a war with Syria? How many corporations will profit from a war on poverty?
Last question, HOW DO YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT?
No comments:
Post a Comment